close
根據ESPN的數據,在七戰四勝制的系列賽中,第一場比賽由主隊獲勝的情況下
有237次主隊都最終贏得該系列賽,只有37次主隊被淘汰,勝率達到86.2%。
而當主隊贏得前兩個主場比賽後,最終勝出並晉級的機率高達94.2%(162勝10負)。
其他數據有
客隊贏下第一場,54勝41負(56.8%) (勝負均指最終贏得整個系列賽的情況,下同)
客隊贏下前兩場,13勝3負(81.3%)
1-1平的情況下第三場比賽主隊獲勝,88勝71負(55.3%)
2-2平的情況下第五場比賽主隊獲勝,103勝36負(74.1%)
第七場比賽,主隊的戰績,78勝19負(80.4%)
By Peter D. Newmann | ESPN Research
Despite what happened to the top-seeded Mavericks in the first round of last season's playoffs,
the Celtics (first in the East) and the Lakers (first in the West)
appear to have a clear-cut advantage when the postseason starts this weekend. NBA Postseason Trends Since 1983-84
現在知道主場優勢有多重要了吧!
有237次主隊都最終贏得該系列賽,只有37次主隊被淘汰,勝率達到86.2%。
而當主隊贏得前兩個主場比賽後,最終勝出並晉級的機率高達94.2%(162勝10負)。
其他數據有
客隊贏下第一場,54勝41負(56.8%) (勝負均指最終贏得整個系列賽的情況,下同)
客隊贏下前兩場,13勝3負(81.3%)
1-1平的情況下第三場比賽主隊獲勝,88勝71負(55.3%)
2-2平的情況下第五場比賽主隊獲勝,103勝36負(74.1%)
第七場比賽,主隊的戰績,78勝19負(80.4%)
By Peter D. Newmann | ESPN Research
Despite what happened to the top-seeded Mavericks in the first round of last season's playoffs,
the Celtics (first in the East) and the Lakers (first in the West)
appear to have a clear-cut advantage when the postseason starts this weekend. NBA Postseason Trends Since 1983-84
Playoff Seed | Win-Loss | Percentage |
No. 1 | 150-45 | .769 |
No. 2 | 146-60 | .709 |
No. 3 | 131-80 | .621 |
No. 4 | 106-111 | .488 |
No. 5 | 111-106 | .512 |
No. 6 | 80-131 | .379 |
No. 7 | 60-146 | .291 |
No. 8 | 45-150 | .231 |
Winner Best-of-Seven Series
When the home team wins Game 1: 231-37 (.862)
When the home team wins first two games: 162-10 (.942)
When the road team wins Game 1: 54-41 (.568)
When the road team wins first two games: 13-3 (.813)
Win percentage by home team in Game 3 when series tied 1-1: 88-71 (.553)
Win percentage by home team in Game 5 when series tied 2-2: 103-36 (.741)
Win percentage by home team in Game 7: 78-19 (.804)
現在知道主場優勢有多重要了吧!
全站熱搜
留言列表